“This is a pandemic. I felt it was a pandemic long before it was called a pandemic.”

— Donald Trump

“Even the pandemic flu of 1918 only killed one to two percent of the people who were infected.”

— Anthony Fauci

“All countries should immediately now activate their pandemic preparedness plans. Countries should remain on high alert for unusual outbreaks of influenza-like illness and severe pneumonia.”

— Margaret Chan, former Director-General of the World Health Organization

“Strong health and disease surveillance systems halt epidemics that take lives, disrupt economies, and pose global health security threats.”

— Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General

“Strong leadership is essential in the face of health crises. Complex public health emergencies demand a collective response with high-level political and diplomatic engagement at both the national and global levels.”

— Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General

“The same unsustainable choices that are killing our planet are killing people. WHO calls on all countries to commit to decisive action at COP26 to limit global warming to 1.5°C – not just because it’s the right thing to do, but because it’s in our own interests.”

— Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General

Something really strange and troubling is going on with the World Health Organization (WHO), a UN agency, and the World Economic Forum (WEF). From its initial charter as an advisory agency, WHO today seems to be taking on a much greater and more active role – for a “Disease X” pandemic yet. Do you know what this is all about? I sure didn’t.

In fact, I hardly knew anything about WHO other than it was just one of the (fifteen) specialized agencies under the United Nations (UN). Interesting factoid: The UN and its agencies are immune from the laws of the countries where they operate, safeguarding the UN’s impartiality with regard to host and member countries. Wikipedia.

Then, since late last year, I have run across increasing numbers of articles about the WHO and its evolving charter, scope, and powers. Mostly quite troubling, to me at least.

Note on Methodology:
I should emphasize here that my approach to zeroing in – if at all possible – on the “truth” or “facts” in any controversial situation like this involves identifying a bounding box or region within which reality is most likely to be found. The “box” itself in most cases consists of “extreme” opinions from various points of view, not all and possibly none of which may be “true” or “factual”.

This approach quite often resolves into a rough spectrum, with its two extremes defined by clusters of similar views. What follows is an attempt to figure out what’s going on with WHO using such a spectrum to organize the views.

As often happens, I began digging into the WHO to see whether it might be worth addressing in a post. What I found very quickly was a great deal of activity that appears to be going on under the radar of most mainstream reporting.

It might be worth first introducing the WHO for those folks who, like myself, may know next to nothing about it.

António Guterres, current Secretary-General of the United Nations.
António Guterres, current Secretary-General of the United Nations.

The World Health Organization (WHO)

From the always-helpful Wikipedia:

“The World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations responsible for international public health. It is headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, and has six regional offices and 150 field offices worldwide.”

“The WHO was established on April 7, 1948, and convened its first meeting on July 24 of that year. It incorporated the assets, personnel, and duties of the League of Nations’ Health Organization and the Paris-based Office International d’Hygiène Publique, including the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). The agency’s work began in earnest in 1951 after a significant infusion of financial and technical resources.”

“The WHO’s official mandate is to promote health and safety while helping the vulnerable worldwide. It provides technical assistance to countries, sets international health standards, collects data on global health issues, and serves as a forum for scientific or policy discussions related to health. Its official publication, the World Health Report, provides assessments of worldwide health topics.”

“The WHO is governed by the World Health Assembly (WHA), which is composed of its 194 member states. The WHA elects and advises an executive board made up of 34 health specialists; selects the WHO’s chief administrator, the director-general (currently Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus of Ethiopia); sets goals and priorities; and approves the budget and activities. The WHO is funded primarily by contributions from member states (both assessed and voluntary), followed by private donors.”

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, current Director-General of the World Health Organization.
Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, current Director-General of the World Health Organization.

“The WHO along with the World Bank constitute the core team responsible for administering the International Health Partnership (IHP+). The IHP+ is a group of partner governments, development agencies, civil society, and others committed to improving the health of citizens in developing countries. Partners work together to put international principles for aid effectiveness and development co-operation into practice in the health sector.”

Interesting set of WHO funding sources, yes?
Interesting set of WHO funding sources, yes?

This happy scenario seems to be a good candidate for one of the extremes bounding this situation: the “nothing-to-see-here-move along” end. That is: WHO is moving thoughtfully and constructively from a largely advisory role to a somewhat more active role of strengthening its abilities to provide effective global coordination and activity – benignly, of course – in the event of another global pandemic. Which will surely happen. Surely.

Surprise: Not all is as it seems from just the official descriptions

“In the name of preventing and fighting pandemics, the Biden Administration and international entities are negotiating an agreement that would establish a public-health technocracy. The proposed treaty, known as the ‘WHO Convention, Agreement or Other International Instrument on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response’ — or WHO CA+, for short — would transform WHO from a purely advisory organization into one with regulatory power to enact international public policies.”

“The WHO director-general would be granted the power to ‘declare pandemics,’ at which point emergency provisions of the treaty to impose public-health policies would go into effect:”

The WHO would be able to dictate policies if international consensus were not obtained [emphasis added] by a vote of the two presidents and four vice presidents of the WHO CA+.”

What Powers Would WHO Be Granted?
WHO would centralize pandemic planning and response into itself: The WHO Global Pandemic Supply Chain and Logistics Network (the ‘Network’) is hereby established. … The Parties shall support the Network’s development and operationalization, and participate in the Network, within the framework of WHO, including through sustaining it in inter-pandemic times as well as appropriate scale-up in the event of a pandemic.”

WHO could also eviscerate existing intellectual-property rights:
In the event of a pandemic, the Parties:

(a) will take appropriate measures to support time-bound waivers of intellectual property rights that can accelerate or scale up manufacturing of pandemic-related products during a pandemic, to the extent necessary to increase the availability and adequacy of affordable pandemic-related products.”

“… The treaty would also allow centralized control over discourse and debate:
Strengthening pandemic and public health literacy.

#1. The Parties commit to increase science, public health and pandemic literacy in the population, as well as access to information on pandemics and their effects, and tackle false, misleading, misinformation or disinformation, including through promotion of international cooperation. In that regard, each Party is encouraged to:

(a) promote and facilitate, at all appropriate levels, in accordance with national laws and regulations, development and implementation of educational and public awareness programs on pandemics and their effects, by informing the public, communicating risk and managing infodemics through effective channels, including social media;

(b) conduct regular social listening and analysis to identify the prevalence and profiles of misinformation, which contribute to design communications and messaging strategies for the public to counteract misinformation, disinformation and false news, thereby strengthening public trust.”

Hmm …

This doesn’t sound too good, yes? “The WHO director-general would be granted the power to ‘declare pandemics,’ at which point emergency provisions of the treaty to impose public-health policies would go into effect.

Or maybe a “Great Reset” of some kind?

What is the “Great Reset”?

Most everybody knows this, but it is probably worth adding a brief reminder note here. From Wikipedia:

“The Great Reset Initiative is an economic recovery plan drawn up by the World Economic Forum (WEF) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The project was launched in June 2020, with a video featuring the then-Prince of Wales Charles released to mark its launch. The initiative’s stated aim is to facilitate rebuilding from the global COVID-19 crisis in a way that prioritizes sustainable development.”

“WEF chief executive officer Klaus Schwab described three core components of the Great Reset: creating conditions for a ‘stakeholder economy’; building in a more ‘resilient, equitable, and sustainable’ way, utilizing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics; and ‘harnessing the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.’ In a speech introducing the initiative, International Monetary Fund [IMF] director Kristalina Georgieva listed three key aspects of a sustainable response to COVID-19: green growth, smarter growth, and fairer growth.”

I am not particularly a fan of the WEF, Klaus Schwab, King Charles, or the IMF, so having all of these associated with the “Great Reset” scheme is quite troubling, to say the least.

My current understanding of the Great Reset is that it is a code phrase for One World Government (and Everything). See here, here, and here.

Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau is fully onboard with the WHO

“Conservative MP Leslyn Lewis of Canada has warned that the Trudeau government wants to include ‘climate change’ in the World Health Organization’s (WHO) definition of a pandemic emergency. The WHO’s Global Pandemic Accord is set to be finalized at the World Health Assembly in May [2024].”

“… In the past, Lewis has warned that the WHO pandemic treaty will compromise Canada’s sovereignty. Last December, she condemned the Trudeau government for agreeing to pandemic amendments put forward by the WHO, which give the international organization more control over Canadian citizens.”

“According to Lewis’ Access to Information request about Canada’s input at the WHO Global Pandemic Accord, the Trudeau government supported the WHO’s global pandemic treaty and suggested that the organization have the right to expand the definition of a pandemic.”

“The response read: ‘The new instrument should be inclusive and defined by an all-hazards approach in alignment with the International Health Regulation.’”

Oh great …

… The WHO pandemic treaty going into effect in May 2024 is already being expanded in scope to include climate change as a “pandemic” trigger.

Dr. Meryl Nass says the quiet part out loud

“Board-certified internist and biological warfare epidemiologist Dr. Meryl Nass issued a disturbing warning that the Pandemic Treaty being pushed by the World Health Organization (WHO) is going to take over the jurisdiction of everything in the world. During the International COVID Summit of the European Parliament held in Brussels, Belgium in May, Nass said that the health authorities will use the treaty to impose the idea that climate change, animals, plants, water systems, and ecosystems are all central to health.”

“According to Nass, the Pandemic Treaty will remove human rights protections currently embedded in the International Health Regulations (IHR), enforce censorship and digital passports, get rid of freedom of speech, require governments to push a single ‘official’ narrative and dictate which drugs should be prescribed in every country.”

“… She also pointed out how the organization is moving to create a whole new set of laws and ignore the existing human rights laws under the pretext of pandemic preparedness and the biosecurity agenda. Nass divulged how it is working on binding states so there are no longer recommendations, providing a liability shield – for vaccine manufacturers and public health officials – getting rid of intellectual property rights, and moving supplies from one country to another.”

“The doctor from Maine added that WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus would be able to declare pandemics at the mere threat of a public health emergency of international concern. He can also call for a world lockdown for declared climate change emergencies as per the treaty.”

Board-certified internist and biological warfare epidemiologist Dr. Meryl Nass.
Board-certified internist and biological warfare epidemiologist Dr. Meryl Nass.

“… Meanwhile, in a separate interview with the independent media organization Bright Light News, the epidemiologist stressed how the ‘One Health’ concept will put animals and ecosystems on the same level as humans. She said under the direction of the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty and proposed changes to the IHR, the United Nations (UN) specialized health agency would be given centralized powers superseding those of its 194 member states’ sovereign governments.”

“Nass explained that under ‘One Health,’ animals and the environment would be given equal status with humans. ‘One of the methods that is being used for the WHO to gain more power is a concept that was rolled out in Davos in 2012 at the World Economic Forum (WEF). This concept states that human health cannot be looked at in isolation.’“

And thus … One World Everything receives yet another booster shot …

I have not yet run across any responses from the WHO, UN, or WEF to these statements by Dr. Nass, a real expert. Very troubling, and May 2024 is so near.

Pile on? The One World Government is rolling out

“The world is closer than ever to a shifting of the ages. And with that shift will come the destruction of the existing world order, followed by its replacement with what many believe will manifest as a one-world government.”

“The Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) ‘pandemic’ marked a shift, or acceleration, into this coming new age, which is now at the doorstep as the powers that be (TPTB) race to fulfill their long-awaited global domination agenda, complete with a brand-new global currency and economic system.”

“This goal, or endgame, has been in the works for decades, if not centuries. The plan is to erase all national sovereignty and supplant it with a unified system of global governance in which most people will own nothing and be ‘happy,’ as World Economic Forum (WEF) chairman Klaus Schwab infamously put it.”

“Many are wondering what this new global government will look like. What we know is that a global government will not look obvious, meaning there will likely never officially be a world government that is easily identifiable by the average person.”

The One World Government of course will not be a monolith that is easily seen and more readily opposed. Instead, it will a joint effort of individual nations globally, which may be the reason why and how the UN was organized and its WHO agency established.

Big changes like these take decades to put in place. Conveniently, the WHO was created decades ago.

So, what does my bounding box, or spectrum, of views look like now?

As so often seems to be the case, the WHO situation looks to be organizing around a spectrum with these two extremes:

#1. Nice WHO: The WHO is presently extending its original advisory role only to an active role that supportsnot directs or controls – the needs of each member state. States remain in control of any actions that each feels may be needed to address the state’s particular situation. The WHO remains as helpful as possible, but benign. Nice.

#2. Not-Nice WHO: The WHO is presently changing its role into a primarily active one that serves the specific purposes of the WEF, the UN, and various related globalist organizations. States are subordinated to the UN and WHO, which together act as an unofficial world government in terms of direction and coordination – particularly as may be required by “pandemic situations and interests”. The WHO in this case can pretty much do whatever its WEF and UN leadership dictate – effectively becoming a world ruler. Not-nice.

There are of course a number of situations possible between these two apparent extremes, especially since the most likely transition is from the official #1 situation toward the potentially malevolent #2 situation. The endpoint of such an effort may well be neither, particularly if strong opposition appears.

Strong opposition already seems to be developing from the BRICS+ and Global South nations. These powerful nations may well succeed in limiting the WHO’s power and scope to something well short of its apparent target.

As I have mentioned before, figuring out exactly what is going on at any point in time involves tracking changes in primary player actions, not words. This is my preferred approach, at least.

My sense at this point (late January 2024) is that the WHO is headed as quickly as it can manage toward outcome #2, but that it will fail because of either rising opposition or some major event such as world war or global pandemic lockdown.

Top 5 Global Risks – according to the WEF

As you may have noticed, the world is a quite risky place to be. Of course, this has always been so since people were invented. Nonetheless, the current set of near-term global risks – as determined by the WEF members’ views – are relevant to the emerging WHO agenda:

Global risks ranked by severity: Source: WEF.

Global risks ranked by severity: Source: WEF.

You will of course not be at all surprised by this WEF priority list. However, there seems to be a significant omission …

Disease X …

How odd, since the current [January 2024] Davos WEF gathering is highlighting just such a risk, or threat if you prefer. Here is what a hugely-credentialed scientist, physician, and inventor has to say:

  • Dr. Robert Malone – see [1] below – via The Burning Platform, in what the WEF and WHO would surely regard as both misinformation and disinformation of the first order, tells it like he sees it: “Disease X and the Corrupt Lancet”:
Dr. Robert Malone.

[1] I am an internationally recognized scientist/physician and the original inventor of mRNA vaccination as a technology, DNA vaccination, and multiple non-viral DNA and RNA/mRNA platform delivery technologies. I hold numerous fundamental domestic and foreign patents in the fields of gene delivery, delivery formulations, and vaccines: including for fundamental DNA and RNA/mRNA vaccine technologies.

I have approximately 100 scientific publications with over 14,000 citations of my work (per Google Scholar with an “outstanding” full-professor impact factor rating). I have been an invited speaker at over 50 conferences, have chaired numerous conferences and I have sat on or served as chairperson on HHS and DoD committees.  I currently sit as a non-voting member on the NIH ACTIV committee, which is tasked with managing clinical research for a variety of drug and antibody treatments for COVID-19.

I received my medical degree from the Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine. I completed the Harvard Medical School fellowship as a global clinical research scholar in 2016 and was scientifically trained at the University of California at Davis, the University of California at San Diego, and at the Salk Institute Molecular Biology and Virology laboratories.  I have served as an assistant and associate professor of pathology and surgery at the University of California at Davis, the University of Maryland, and the Armed Forces University of the Health Sciences.

Source.

“The globalists launch their new weapon to take over the world.
It is Davos (World Economic Forum) week and the MSM hysterical propaganda push from the globalists regarding ‘disease X’ is in full swing. Just take a gander at a few of the Corporate Mockingbird Media headlines today.”

“Almost every major news outlet in the world has run black propaganda pieces about disease X. Why do I write black propaganda – because the ‘experts’ aren’t actually named, the peer-reviewed papers supporting the thesis of ‘a deadly pathogen causing 20 times more deaths than COVID-19’ or ‘killing 20 times more people than COVID-19’ or ‘killing 50 million people’ are non-existent. Yet these narratives are all headline news in main stream media.”

“This is just another exercise in globalized messaging to support the WHO (World Economic Forum) and WEF pushed narrative that governments must pour $billions into the largest transnational corporations in the world to ‘cure’ a non-existent disease.”

“What isn’t black propaganda but rather grey propaganda is that this fearporn is being pushed by the WEF and the WHO. WHO officials are most of the featured speakers and panelists on ‘Disease X’ at the Davos meeting this week. From the WEF website:”

“World leaders are set to discuss preparation for the next pandemic at the World Economic Forum in Davos…”

“Officials from across the globe will be heading to the annual meeting in Switzerland, with the risk posed by what’s known as Disease X one of the key items on the agenda.”

“The meeting will address new warnings from the World Health Organization (WHO) that the unidentified disease could kill 20 times more people than the coronavirus pandemic.”

“… According to the WHO, Disease X is all about One Health solutions. The World Health organization describes One Health as the following:”

“Government officials, researchers and workers across sectors at the local, national, regional and global levels should implement joint responses to health threats. This includes developing shared databases and surveillance across different sectors, and identifying new solutions that address the root causes and links between risks and impacts.”

“… Basically One Health gives public health official total control and surveillance across AI, the internet, agriculture, climate change, public health, medical systems, ecological sites, urban and rural areas. It can encompass just about anything. It also values animal and plant life as equal to human life.”

For some obscure reason, Dr. Malone was not invited to speak at the WEF gathering. Probably just an oversight …

Or perhaps because the real WEF Davos agenda was climate change

“The global elite plan to introduce a near-permanent ‘global state of emergency’ by re-branding climate change as a ‘public health crisis’ that is ‘worse than covid’. This is not news. But the ongoing campaign has been accelerating in recent weeks. I have written about this a lot over the last few years – see here and here and here. It started almost as soon as Covid started, and has been steadily progressing ever since, with some reports calling climate change ‘worse than covid’. [See also this one: “Is a “Climate Lockdown” on the horizon?”.]

“But if they keep talking about it, I’ll keep writing. And hopefully the awareness will spread. Anyway, there’s a renewed push on the ‘climate = public health crisis’ front. It started, as so many things do, with Bill Gates, stating in an interview with MSNBC in late September:

“We have to put it all together; it’s not just climate’s over here and health is over here, the two are interacting” — Bill Gates

“Since then there’s been a LOT of ‘climate change is a public health crisis’ in the papers, likely part of the build-up to the UN’s COP28 summit later this year.”

The COPs?

What are COPs and what is their purpose?

The Conference of the Parties (COP) to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is an international climate summit, which is held annually unless the Parties (the countries involved) decide otherwise. At COPs, world leaders gather to work together on solutions to tackle climate change. There are now 198 Parties (197 countries plus the European Union) to the Convention, constituting near universal membership.”

Umm … so the COPs are part of a UN compliance multiplex? Of course …

“In a session titled ‘Disease X,’ Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus stated that in order to be ‘better prepared’ and ‘to understand disease X,’ the WHO’s ‘Pandemic Agreement’ needs to be adopted globally. ‘This is about a common enemy,’ Tedros continued, adding ‘without a shared response, we will face the same problem as COVID.’”

“He explained that the decline for the legislation is May of this year and member states are negotiating between countries to implement it. ‘This is a common global interest, and very narrow national interests should not come in the way,’ he continued, adding ‘of course national interests are natural, but they could be difficult and affect the negotiations.’”

And of course you have heard all about the “Disease Act of 2023”, yes? No? Well, me neither …

“In June 2023, the United States Congress quietly passed a piece of legislation called House Resolution 3832, also known as the Disease X Act of 2023, that references a mystery contagion that just so happens to be the subject of a World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting that took place on Jan. 17, 2024.”

Bottom line:

Apologies for this overly-long post, but the topic seems much too important not to try outlining it here as completely as possible. The WHO is clearly changing its former advisory focus and powers toward something much more in line with the globalists led by the WEF and the UN – with the U.S.-based West in full support.

Only the BRICS+ nations and the Global South, with Russia and China leading these, appear to be offering any significant opposition to whatever the globalists are up to. Since this Eurasian-‘Globalist Majority’ gang account for merely about 70% of the world’s land mass and population, their opinions may not be considered seriously by the globalists.

Such efforts seem inevitably destined to fail, so far as I can see. While the globalists have made tremendous progress in a few short years, they would likely prevail were it not for this fatal weakness: they are supremely arrogant, obsessive, and ambitious. And just intelligent, but not smart. Perfect formula for ultimate failure, but not before creating the time of incredibly-painful situations and widespread suffering that we are now experiencing.

  • From BOOM Finance and Economics, which claims to ‘seek out the very best information from authoritative sources’ and to ‘strive for consistency in its quality and trustworthiness’, describes the WHO as a “… military branch of the United Nations”:

“The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s major organization to promote vaccination, CEPI, was founded and based in Norway. CEPI stands for the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations. At its launch in 2017, CEPI announced that Norway was its largest source of funding.”

“Curiously, the Chair of the Board of CEPI also sat on the Executive Board of the World Health Organization (2004–2007), President of the World Health Assembly (2007), Chair of the Executive Board of WHO, and Chair of the OECD Health Committee (2007–2012).”

“The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s other pro-vaccination NGO is called GAVI, based in Switzerland – the ‘Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization’. Norway is its 4th largest funding arm.”

“’My understanding is that all officers of US federal and state governments are subordinated to the US Secretary of Health and Human Services for the duration of any ‘public health emergency,’ as unilaterally declared by the HHS Secretary, using authority placed in his hands through domestic kill-box laws enacted through the mechanisms of Congressional votes and presidential signatures.”

“The HHS Secretary himself, and the US federal and state government officials he controls for the duration of any declared ‘public health emergency,’ are subordinated to the UN and WHO, under the terms of international agreements adopted and sustained by the mechanism of silence/inaction/non-rejection/non-withdrawal by Congress, presidents, federal and state courts, and state legislatures.”

“The HHS Secretary serves two functions: he’s an administrator, tasked by his United Nations supervisors with implementing and directing UN-WHO military-public health policies and programs in the US, and he’s a dictator in his relationship to other branches and officers of the US government, the governments of the 50 states, and the people.”

“So – in a “public health emergency”, who is ‘the dictator’ of the United States?”

Xavier Becerra, born January 26, 1958 is an American lawyer and politician serving as the 25th United States Secretary of Health and Human Services since March 2021.”

“The WHO is a military branch of the United Nations;”

“The UN is engaged in a military attack on the world’s people under ‘public health emergency’ pretexts, using totalitarian policies and programs (informational, surveillance, testing, masking, social distancing); military, law enforcement, and public health proxies (DoD-directed biological weapons manufacturers, FDA officials, pharmacists, and nurses) and toxic products (poisons/weapons) that are falsely presented as medicinal treatments; and “

“National governments legally can and prudently should withdraw from the United Nations and the World Health Organization, under their own domestic laws and Article 62 of the Vienna Convention on Treaties, due to the ‘fundamental change of circumstances:’ public understanding of the two preceding facts gained through the Covid-19 events that have occurred since January 2020.”

“QUOTE: I think US domestic law has already transferred sovereign government functions to the United Nations World Health Organization, such that current IHR amendments, (if the United States remains a UN and WHO member), and when they enter into force, will increase the speed, expand the scope and strengthen the force of the geopolitical coup that has already taken place.”

“QUOTE: The US federal and state government officials — for so long as they silently defer to illegitimate, unconstitutional international legal instruments and domestic, implementing kill-box laws — are subordinate to the HHS Secretary during a public health emergency.”

“And the HHS Secretary and all other US federal and state government officials are subordinate to the UN-WHO — for so long as they silently defer to illegitimate, unconstitutional international legal instruments — under the terms of international treaties and other ‘binding instruments of international law.’”

“The basic goal of the architects, which has been achieved, was to set up legal conditions in which all governing power in the United States could be automatically transferred from the citizens and the three Constitutional branches into the two hands of the Health and Human Services Secretary, effective at the moment the HHS Secretary himself declared a public health emergency, legally transforming free citizens into enslaved subjects.”

“That happened on Jan. 31, 2020, in effect as of Jan. 27, 2020, through the present day.”

“In other words: Congress and U.S. presidents legalized and funded the overthrow of the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. government, and the American people, through a massive domestic bioterrorism program re-labelled as a public health program, conducted by the HHS Secretary and Secretary of Defense on behalf of the World Health Organization and its financial backers.”

“The World Health Organization (WHO) has announced plans to roll out a global police force that will be responsible for punishing citizens who spread non-mainstream content on the Internet.”

“In a session titled ‘Disease X,’ WHO Director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus declared that in order to be ‘better prepared’ and ‘to understand disease X,’ the WHO’s legally binding ‘Pandemic Agreement’ needs to be adopted by leaders worldwide.”

“The Pandemic Agreement would grant the WHO unprecedented control over sovereign nations – allowing them to outlaw free speech and imprison citizens for sharing so-called ‘misinformation’ online.”

“’This is about a common enemy,’ Tedros said, adding ‘without a shared response, we will face the same problem as COVID.’ He explained that the deadline for the legislation is May of this year and member states are negotiating between countries to implement it.”

“’This is a common global interest, and very narrow national interests should not come in the way,’ he continued, adding ‘of course national interests are natural, but they could be difficult and affect the negotiations.’”

Greek wisdom, and the Serenity prayer (attributed to Reinhold Niebuhr, Lutheran theologian).
Greek wisdom, and the Serenity prayer (attributed to Reinhold Niebuhr, Lutheran theologian).